Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Proposed Schedule



Proposed LHS Schedule 2013 - 2014
7-Period Semester Rollover Schedule - 60 minute Class Periods with extended lunch and remediation
7 classes, attend 6 a day ● PLC - Wednesday morning ● 7:30 - 2:45 daily, except Wednesday ● 60 minutes classes (4 every week)

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday
1 (7:30 - 8:30)

1 (7:30 - 8:30)

PLC (7:30 - 9:35)

1 (7:30 - 8:30)

2 (7:30 - 8:30)
2 (8:35- 9:35)

2 (8:35- 9:35)



3 (8:35- 9:35)

3 (8:35- 9:35)
3 (9:40 - 10:40)

3 (9:40 - 10:40)

1 (9:40 - 10:40)

4 (9:40 - 10:40)

4 (9:40 - 10:40)
4 (10:45 - 11:45)

5 (10:45 - 11:45)

2 (10:45 - 11:45)

5 (10:45 - 11:45)

5 (10:45 - 11:45)
L1 (11:45 - 12:10)

L1 (11:45 - 12:10)

L1 (11:45 - 12:10)

L1 (11:45 - 12:10)

L1 (11:45 - 12:10)
R2 (12:10 - 12:40)

R2 (12:10 - 12:40)

R2 (12:10 - 12:40)

R2 (12:10 - 12:40)

R2 (12:10 - 12:40)
R1 (11:45 - 12:15)

R1 (11:45 - 12:15)

R1 (11:45 - 12:15)

R1 (11:45 - 12:15)

R1 (11:45 - 12:15)
L2 (12:15 - 12:40)

L2 (12:15 - 12:40)

L2 (12:15 - 12:40)

L2 (12:15 - 12:40)

L2 (12:15 - 12:40)
6 (12:40 - 1:40)

6 (12:40 - 1:40)

4 (12:40 - 1:40)

6 (12:40 - 1:40)

6 (12:40 - 1:40)
7 (1:45 - 2:45)

7 (1:45 - 2:45)

5 (1:45 - 2:45)

7 (1:45 - 2:45)

7 (1:45 - 2:45)

This schedule was developed to maintain the elements of student choice in courses, allow for better timing of state and national tests, and provide a time for student and teacher collaboration to address interventions, enrichment's, and learning opportunities.  

Students have the possibility of earning an extended lunch period by meeting the requirements of their classes and showing proficiency on the course standards.  Teachers will be assigned a Lunch (L) and a class time (R) when they will be available to provide additional support to all students.  The full design of that hour long period is being developed by an action team at LHS which includes students, parents, teachers, and staff.  Minutes of each meeting are being shared out on http://LHSActionteam.blogspot.com
 
We recognize that this schedule will require 10 additional minutes before and 10 additional minutes after school.  This impacts our bussing schedules and other schools.  We have started working with transportation on possible remedies as not to impact the other schools and bus times.  In recognition of these obstacles we have also created a similar schedule with 55 minute class periods that would allow us to start and end our day at our current times of 7:40 and 2:35 respectively.  We will also be working with BATC on cooperative schedules that will allow our students to continue to take courses at the Logan Campus of BATC. 

Monday, January 7, 2013

Intervention Meeting 1 1/7/13


1/7/13

In Attendance: Shane Ogden, Jim Peacock, Jill Lowe, Mrs. Hamblin, Lacy Fonnesbeck, Donna Starley, Paul Wagner, Gordon Geddes, Curtis Jenson, Kelly Bennett, Drew Nielson,

Shane: Introductions, Where we are in the process, what the point of the group is.  The schedule will be posted on our website and presented to the school board tomorrow. 
We have talked about an early out Friday and the teachers will use that time for in-services.  Many students have communicated to me that they love the Wednesday morning break up.  There are also some bussing barriers, adding time at the beginning and end of the day.  We have decided on the 60-minute class periods. 
We need to set a schedule today.  We want to have this finalized by mid March.  This is when the real work begins.  This is step 2 of this process.  It has been brought up by teachers and students that we need to look at grading and homework.  Where do we want to start?
-create definitive timeline
-what is needed to be reviewed (data, research)
-vision of system (what does it look, feel like)
-logistics of entering/exiting
-logistics of management
-transitions (9th grade-course?)
-training (staff/students/community)
-needed staffing to run program
-timing of intervention
-enrichment

Shane:  We do have additional money available with School Trustlands that we could hire someone (paraprofessional) to manage the system. 
Kelly:  I like what Jim said about citizenship.   If students have good citizenship and are coming to school, we offer them enrichment opportunities.  We could offer AP Art, or something the students will enjoy.  That way we tie in these activities.
Paul:  We need to add Enrichment with it’s own bullet point.  At Sky View, each teacher has on their door where they will be during that intervention time.
Mrs. Hamblin: I have a worry about the lunchtime.  Students are not able to get into the lunchroom and eat in 30 minutes.  I have heard complaints from parents and students.
Shane:  We cannot get our entire student body in the lunchroom.  We would have a 1-hour lunch.  Our district personnel and lunchroom servers are behind us and will help us overcome any obstacles that will come our way.  I can make it through the end of the lunch line and have time to eat my food because we have put a few changes in the lunchroom. 
Kelly:  Are we looking at remediation as an In School Suspension?
Shane:  I think behaviors when I hear that, not academic.  That is more of a citizenship issue.  We need to look at our attendance policy as well.
Kelly: Are we looking at behavior and remediation?
Shane: We don’t want our intervention to be punitive, it needs to be supportive.  We also need to be aware that some students will see this as punitive no matter what we do.
Kelly:  Are we going to add that to our discussion?  Why the reason for the extended lunch?
Shane:  I think we need to address it sometime, and need to look at different pyramid of interventions.
Drew:  We wanted students to see that they need the help available.  We saw this as a time to help our kids and allow them to earn something, rather than the punitive part of this.
Kelly:  I have students that are getting good grades but have horrible attendance.  What are we going to do about those students?
Shane:  there is another issue there.  If students can pass out of a class because they know the material, is misplaced.
Drew: Our remediation is tied to academic performance.
Shane:  We need to address issues from the attendance side of things or citizenship.  We can look at those citizenship pieces that look at students having a certain number of points to be able to walk at graduation, etc.
Drew:  I can see students not coming to class and also not coming to intervention.  Then what?
Paul:  This is not a make up your work program only.  It is a re-teaching moment for those that don’t get it the first time.  This can help with building those relationships with kids who need to know a teacher cares.
Curtis:  They are all tied together in some way.
Paul:  We need to revisit the attendance policy, so that it’s more effective.
Kelly:  I have a hard time seeing how this is going to help, everything has a consequence.
Shane:  Look at our prison systems…they are not helping reform people.  80% of offenders will be back for the same things.
Mrs. Hamblin:  We just need to remember that we are here trying to help the students that need to be re-taught, and attendance needs to be important for students as well as parents.  That is an issue that will need to address.
Jim:  Do we need to look at attendance now?  While we are going through this process?  We don’t have the time for it to happen naturally.  I am suggesting that what others have said here.
Drew:  Would it be enough if we look at triggers or entrance and exit criteria where attendance would tie into this?  Rather than try to tackle this whole beast?
Shane:  We are forced out of compliance with our attendance policy.  We really should be looking at both right now, possibly with another group and then come together?
Jim: Our attendance policy is not failing; it’s just not feasible with the resources we have.
Paul:  I like the citizenship piece.  We could have students sign attendance contracts or behavior contract.  If the student obtains a U (unsatisfactory), they need to come in for a meeting with parents. 
Shane:  We bought alarm clocks, we met with parents, but we didn’t suspend them.  Contracts work if parents are there.  Let’s assign some jobs out before the next time we meet that ties research in on these two topics.
Paul:  how much attendance can be a portion of a student’s grade?
Jim:  It’s illegal for us to grade on attendance.
Shane:  There have been some lawsuits that are getting more and more common.  Attendance itself cannot be tied into a grade.  Participation itself is under scrutiny for what is and isn’t participation.
We talked about how often do we need to meet-the last group met for 6 weeks twice a week.  So is Monday and Thursday from 3-4:30 again.    







Thursday, December 6, 2012

December 3rd Meeting: Consensus



AT minutes
12/3/12
In Attendance: Shane Ogden, Jim Peacock, Jill Lowe, Donna Starley, Mike Mudrow, Paul Wagner, Mary Morgan, Brad Nelson, Lacy Fonnesbeck, Toph Cottle, Drew Neilson, Lisa Hopkins, Jason Soffe
Excused: Curtis Jenson, Gordon Geddes
Minute taker entered midway through the meeting-
Presentation/breakdown of schedules in depth:
AB modified:
Semester Modified:
Lisa:  What about sports or other activities that would fall every week on the same time.  Students will be missing the same time every week.
Mike:  Every schedule is not perfect; it’s something we would need to discuss.  The schedule, the preps, the courses are not being lost.  We would keep our high scores for our students.  We are losing student workload.  We are also gaining flexibility and intervention time for our students.
Shane:  Minor issue with BATC.  We will also lose lunch ladies if we don’t have students eating lunch.  When we speak with them tomorrow, that will be brought up.  All of these schedules have the same lunch proposal.
Paul:  I have been on both sides of the fence, but I feel that we get the best options with this modified schedule.  We get the prep time we need. 
Trimester Modified: (presentation)
Brad:  we cannot go back to the trimester.  This is the modified tri-block that has the intervention.  Can earn 28 credits.  Students would have 6 periods and have just as many options as they do now.  Math would be an ABC.  Some AP science classes also go all year.  This schedule will give us many options.
Jim:  This schedule is not adjusting any graduation requirements.  Not changing any foreign language or social studies classes.  It gives our students the best options.
Shane:  My concern is now filling a student’s 15 classes?  Teachers may have to teach what they have to teach instead of what they have a passion to teach.
Brad:  We may be short for faculty. 
Drew:  How short are we?  That’s a serious concern that we don’t lose teachers.  I know we can’t be guaranteed anything.  I just know that we would be remiss if we changed schedules and lost any teachers.
Donna:  Every student is required to take ED-tech.  Do the math for that class.  How big are those classes-20 students per class?  It won’t be funded at that.
Paul:  That’s when we start shuffling teachers like we did when we did the RIF.  Gordon ended up having to teach some remedial math classes that he doesn’t love.
Donna:  We could do the financial lit and see the trickle-down effect.
Brad:  Somewhere we have made an adjustment to come here. 
Mike:  We could lose faculty with this.
Donna:  Would we change the graduation requirements?  We would have to change them to do this.
Brad:  55 minute classes and 40 minute classes on Wednesdays, or 50 minute periods on Wednesdays with shortened PLC time.  Here is the trimester minute breakdown-9360 minutes per year for 3 trimesters.
Mike:  Does the core change depending on what schedule you are on? 
Brad:  The core is what it is.  That doesn’t change.
Shane:  For classes that you have a CRT and teaching a c, those classes might lose some worthwhile class time.  What happens to those students?
Paul:  There is also the issue of giving all students a C classes who might not need it.
Brad:  pros of this schedule.  Duel class options…getting two for one credits for students (medical term & math credits).  It’s a little more work for the instructor. 
Shane: I can see math 1, 2 and 3 using all three trimesters.
Drew:  Minute break down of total minutes per year….for students and teacher (prep and workload).  Average per class.
Block: students per class-40, students per day 240
Semester: students per class-42, students per day 168
Trimester: students per class-36, students per day 180  
RUBRIC ELEMENTS:

Semester
AB Modified
Trimester

Minutes p/week




Minutes p/day




Minutes p/year




Simplicity




Focus Group




Course choices




Teacher workload




Student workload




Schedule Constraints





Drew:  I have to be honest, I like having my minority students all year.  I love being able to get to know them.  What’s best for them might not be best for our majority.
Shane:  You are right; it’s about building relationships with them.
Drew:  I think we need to turn this over to the administration and allow them to decide and we will support what they decide.
Paul:  It’s between the semester and trimester-modified schedules.
Drew:  We need to get back to our classes and students; this is eating up so much of our time.
Shane:  Have we answered the questions about moving to the trimesters?  Increased grad requirements, relationships, instructional contact, testing schedules and scores, accreditation team recommendation.
Lisa: statewide testing seems to revolve around the semester schedule.  Most schools are on the AB.
Shane:  Drew said that he felt his minority students do better on the semester vs. the trimester.  My worry is that this minority group is the kids we are looking at, that are failing.  Gordon had 46 kids in his remedial class and 3 kids were not Hispanic.  Jim made the comment that Utah as a whole is doing a crappy job and educating minority students.  I believe our advanced kids are going to do great no matter what.  They have lots of options.  I still worry about the group of kids that needs more. Toph?
Jason: Semester does provide more time. It’s a huge advantage for students that need more time.   I can go through lessons with more time.  I worry with the trimester will take away that time.  
Toph:  I can’t represent the minority, but it’s not working right now.  So, we need to implement intervention time.
Mary:  With Math, we have more time to help those students and slow down.
Shane:  Will that speed increase with a rolling semester?  If that total time per week is the same?
Brad:  If the semester isn’t working now, why will it work in the future?
Donna:  It should be about the intervention.  All models have addressed the same amount of time for intervention.
Lisa:  Class time can be a problem, but an intervention will help address that.  Unless we change some other things, it’s not going to address that.  I can see an easy fit with going to semesters.  If the doesn’t work, we can look at a bigger schedule change.  Maybe we just take one piece of the puzzle at a time and change that.
Mary:  What about making this the intervention on Wednesday afternoon instead of morning?
Brad: we need to go into this with full steam.  It’s all or nothing.
Shane:  Are we at a consensus that we are going to leave it to the administration to decide on the two schedules?