AT Minutes
11/28/12
In Attendance: Shane
Ogden, Jill Lowe, Jim Peacock, Paul Wagner, Lacy Fonnesbeck, Drew Neilson, Brad
Nelson, Curtis Jenson, Gordon Geddes, Mike Mudrow, Mary Morgan, Donna Starley,
Sharilee Griffiths, Toph Cottle
Excused: Jason Soffe
Mary: In the SPED
department, a rollover is hard. They
have to have aids and personnel here at specialized times. Here are a few schedule examples of student
schedules.
Drew: Aren’t they in self-contained
classrooms?
Mary: No, not all are
self-contained. A full time staff is
something else, and there wouldn’t be as many concerns. Tashina has 16 students right now.
Donna: We could do
something that is not as complicated and keep it simple.
Paul: I shared some
rolling ideas with our English dept. Not
many liked it, it just sounds messy. No
real reasons why they didn’t like it.
Gordon: I saw the
same thing in the social studies deparment.
Paul: What if we did
a 6 period tri that is optional period for students that need it. All students would have 5 periods. Half teachers, half students could start
later or earlier. This is good for
students who want electives and AP courses.
Bussing would be an issue. Our
credit earning potential could go up to 9 available credits.
Brad: I like the options
and flexibility.
Mary: This also
allows our students to retake classes the very next trimester instead of
waiting a whole year.
Donna: How can we
fund this when we won’t be getting anymore FTE if a student would like to take
one extra class?
Sharilee: Would you
have teachers who would like to start early and kids wanting to come late?
Shane: An obstacle is
going to be bussing. We need to keep
that in mind.
Drew: Why not just
have some students having certain hours off?
Shane: How many students
are helping out parents who are working?
Sharilee, what do you think?
Sharilee: I know many
of our Hispanic students are doing it.
They would have a hard time getting here by then. Some after school kids that stay for tutoring
and mentoring and would struggle.
Mike: I still haven’t heard anyone address instructional
gaps and CRT’s.
Shane: I will address
the instructional gaps and CRT. A longer
period will address that through differentiated learning and working in smaller
groups. The research has shown that
longer periods will help with that.
Mike: Please look at
this schedule I handed out.
Paul: If we run it
like Sky View, and introduce ala carte in the lobby and extend the lunch hour,
we would need to work with the lunch people to prepare all lunches.
Shane: We have 300
more students than county schools. We
don’t have the actual equipment to make the lunch in that much time. We serve more students here than either
county school.
Mike: with this schedule, we are staying within the bounds
of where we are now with just more class time.
Brad: We spoke with
Dave Isom about the different schedules he has been on and why certain things
work. He really like the trimester the
best because of the time issues, not too much, but just enough.
Gordon: I can see
prep time issues with some teachers getting more free time than others.
Shane: We need to
remember it’s about our students options.
We can’t cater to teachers that have to teach only certain hours. It really limits our students.
Mike: I think we are
getting more contact hours with our students and that’s why our scores are so
much better.
Donna: I agree with
Shane, we need something that isn’t going to put departments and teachers
against each other.
Lacy: What about some
of the schedules they are doing in Wyoming and also Rich High School. We would have to extend the school day. A four day school week. Take the Friday and use the time elsewhere
where it can be better for the kids.
Shane: Some schools
have had great success with that and not many athletics. With 14 athletic events, it’s going to be
impossible to say that those can’t be interrupted. The school is very small and rural and can
get away from that. Also, as a result,
they have lost championship teams. Many
schools will only travel on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. Parents hate it because they lose their
weekends. It’s an option. I haven’t asked about us having later start
times for PLC’s. I will bet that we are
tied to that, like we have currently.
Brad: I would like to
take this modified tri and identify the hurdles. I am not sure that we can’t overcome some of
these.
Mike: I will plug
this into my computer and run what this would look like.
Shane: Issues: Bussing, FTE funding, kids only 5, teaching 4
out of 5, Hispanic families concern.
What are our must haves? Contact
time during the day or yearlong? My
research shows that it’s during the day, length during the school day that
helps more.
MUST HAVES:
Mike: I was very
skeptical when we moved from trimesters to semesters. The teacher at MC is an awesome teacher, and
has won many awards. She has lower
scores than I do and she attributes that to her class time. A trimester has fallbacks when it comes to 1st
and 2nd tri with and test during the 3rd.
Mary: We can get
around the concerns from Paul’s Kelly Tri.
We just create a 6 period tri. We
can have before and after school programs for kids that don’t have the first
hour but just have to ride the bus. We
would only have the bus come once.
Paul: We would run
into staffing issues with that. What is
the magic number of class time? We need
to know what minutes would look like.
Brad: I would like to
tackle some of these hurdles and see if we could actually make some of these
work.
Donna: I worry about
our Fine Arts-Chauntairs, the musical classes.
What will be required?
Shane: I spoke with
Dave about what they do at Sky View.
Mike: I am still
reserved about our instructional gaps and CRT scores.
Lacy: Why can’t we
put the junky Friday time somewhere else?
Shane: I love 4 day
work weeks. However, there are still
lots of limitations. Our hourly
employees were hurt with one less work day.
It does affect them and their family.
That halted it in Idaho where I was.
I have seen Friday intervention days that don’t work. It also will bring our Hispanic students into
concern again, where they need to be home to help parents.
Mike: Four day weeks
wouldn’t work with the 60 minute classes, we are eliminating options again.
Paul: What about a 6
period tri, with a rollover. 70 minute
classes with an intervention time every day.
We would have to decide what courses could go year round and have the
data to support.
Lacy: We waste lots of instructional time with start and
stops. We are not teaching actually 3100
hours.
Donna: I have already
handed the list out with the data we need to decide what classes would need
what.
Mike: I can provide
information tomorrow.
Shane: Paul made the
comment that not all minutes are created equal.
The last four weeks of school are worth half of what the rest of the
year. That makes me wonder how to get
classes AB, that’s the way a trimester would work.
Curtis: what was
wrong with AB rollover?
Shane: Sub-plans
shouldn’t be just finding a video. It
should be preparing for the school day.
The biggest issue with AB modified is the staffing concerns to staff for
8 periods and also training our staff to be able to utilize their time.
Brad: Math also
suffered on the rollover schedule.
Lacy: I don’t think
that the AB rollover or modified has been an option we have really looked
at. We probably could work out the
issues that are associated with it. I
think people are just scared to look at the block. It makes better teachers.
Shane: We could still
offer quarter classes for those classes that don’t need the whole
semester. We should still be looking at
it. We need to go back to our pro and
con list. The modified AB rollover had
more pros than with any other schedule.
Paul: I think this
modified 6 period rolling trimester is something that could answer all the
questions. The FTE is the issue that I
can’t answer. There aren’t any problems
here. We could be flexible.
Shane: Will everyone
want the first two periods? If we are
looking at the trimester, we need to be able to address the issues that we
faced when we moved away from the tri.
We still have the questions in place.
Jim: It’s now a
modified tri. We have an intervention
and a sixth period.
Donna: Please take
this sheet back to your department and ask each department would have to be a
C.
Shane: No one
submitted any new courses for the year to us, so we still have the same courses
that we have now. As long as it was on
the list last year.
Mike: Donna, can you
address the BATC issues?
Donna: They work with
us and grumble a little but can make it work.
They might be happy with us if we moved back to a tri like everyone
else. Please email me what you find with
the courses that need a C and I will put this in today.
I think the reason no new classes have been presented to add, is because the school continues to eliminate elective classes. So please consider two things. 1) keep it simple for the kids 2) more choices will help keep our students more engaged.
ReplyDeleteI support Trimesters
http://educationnext.org/do-schools-begin-too-early/
ReplyDeleteI find evidence consistent with this explanation: among middle school students, the impact of start times is greater for older students (who are more likely to have entered adolescence). However, I also find evidence of other potential mechanisms; later start times are associated with reduced television viewing, increased time spent on homework, and fewer absences. Regardless of the precise mechanism at work, my results from Wake County suggest that later start times have the potential to be a more cost-effective method of increasing student achievement than other common educational interventions such as reducing class size.